Tuesday, February 14, 2012
Sunday, February 12, 2012
The entanglement of things
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/64ded/64ded4eb85094f28197e4dc3fb85315bbb3cdf3b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/81a30/81a3064e1f1d7d225b41e0c507a4cdcb13555642" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fb338/fb338aa412cd7f376125ad3e0314f8660ef8d08b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6626a/6626a70393ea15614f01368a83bb45c2fa053995" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4ce97/4ce97a249a57e15114c6a489706497c7c8f32349" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03bc2/03bc2d84ab6a2e0e045c793ed7041a69120cbf73" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70673/70673b6d6bda5a672f26d5f2587e93d0d57ed22a" alt=""
"... a certain gathering together of the threads of life. That is what I mean by a thing. In this I follow – albeit rather loosely – the argument classically advanced by the philosopher Martin Heidegger. In his celebrated essay on The Thing, Heidegger was at pains to figure out precisely what makes a thing different from an object. The object stands before us as a fait accompli, presenting its congealed, outer surfaces to our inspection. It is defined by its very ‘over-againstness’ in relation to the setting in which it is placed (Heidegger 1971: 167). The thing, by contrast, is a ‘going on’, or better, a place where several goings on become entwined. To observe a thing is not to be locked out but to be invited in to the gathering. We participate, as Heidegger rather enigmatically put it, in the thing’ thinging in a worlding world. There is of course a precedent for this view of the thing as a gathering in the ancient meaning of the word as a place where people would gather to resolve their affairs. If we think of every participant as following a particular way of life, threading a line through the world, then perhaps we could define the thing, as I have suggested elsewhere, as a ‘parliament of lines’ (Ingold 2007a: 5). Thus conceived, the thing has the character not of an externally bounded entity, set over and against the world, but of a knot whose constituent threads, far from being contained within it, trail beyond, only to become caught with other threads in other knots. Or in a word, things leak, forever discharging through the surfaces that form temporarily around them."
BRINGING THINGS TO LIFE: CREATIVE ENTANGLEMENTS IN A WORLD OF MATERIALS
Tim Ingold
tim.ingold@abdn.ac.uk
Department of Anthropology University of Aberdeen Aberdeen AB24 3QY Scotland
UK
April 2008
http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=www.reallifemethods.ac.uk%2F...%2Fvital-signs-ingold-bringing-things-to-li.&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a